Examining the digital upload

We are coming towards the end of April, and by now most examiners are well into the process of working their way through their digital upload allocations.

Of course it’s not just the art teachers who miss the old ‘visiting examiner’ experience – many examiners also miss it.

Arriving at a school and experiencing the physical reality of artworks in an exhibition context and talking to the student (invariably eager to explain their experiences of the creative process) was a wonderful experience.

I miss the face-to-face contact, and the reality of artwork that I could touch or walk around, and it was always good to talk art teachers about how they interpreted the programme – but there are compensations.

Obviously the art assessment process experience now is different; but with a new, powerful and high spec computer linked to two high-resolution monitors, plus surround sound audio, with the opportunity to pause and replay parts of the interview, and as long as I want to spend examining details of pages or artworks, I have to admit – there are advantages.

On one screen I have the interview (usually video, occasionally audio) playing alongside the candidate statement, while on the other I can scrutinize whatever studio work the student is talking about, and I can also scroll through the workbook pages if I want (usually a ‘zoomable’ pdf file). There is also space for the assessment descriptors for me to refer to while watching and listening.

And of course for the first time moderation is based on exactly what the examiner has seen. Previously my team leader never saw the exhibition: he/she only saw the Candidate Record Booklet and read my comment – whereas now we all see the upload.

I’m sorry not to be flying off to interview candidates in Copenhagen, Amsterdam and Rome (and other places) – but I’m still watching the interview and I’m still enjoying this sense of culmination, the final show and the voice of the student artist reflecting on challenges and achievements.



Yes Greg – go for it!


Artwork by my students

  • Nigel Hall
    April 30, 2014

    Digital upload assessment is only advantageous on the grounds of cost, nothing else. Would the supporters of the new assessment process also recommend that Tate Modern, MOMA, The Louvre etc closed their doors to the visitor and only served a diet of 72dpi digital images? Is the suggestion really that the same experience can be had remotely on a screen as can be had marveling at the texture, depth, vibrancy, and sheer sumptuousness of being at close contact with the physical manifestation of creative thought? Perhaps it is worth considering the values of the IB learner profile and just wondering if the new assessment process negates the ability to fully engage in many of these ideals.

  • Andrew Vaughan
    May 7, 2014

    Hi Nigel,
    Thanks for responding! I’ve posted some thoughts in my latest blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *